The RFC Archive
 The RFC Archive   RFC 679   « Jump to any RFC number directly 
 RFC Home
Full RFC Index
Recent RFCs
RFC Standards
Best Current Practice
RFC Errata
1 April RFC



IETF RFC 679

February, 1975, Survey of New-Protocol Telnet Servers

Last modified on Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Permanent link to RFC 679
Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 679
Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 679







Network Working Group                                         D.W. Dodds
Request for Comments: 679                                     BBN-TENEXA
NIC: 31890                                                 February 1975


         February, 1975, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers

   It has been two and a half months since our last survey, and it has
   been depressing to note that "progress" toward an all-new-protocol
   network has been even slower than previously.  Changes since the last
   list (with host numbers in octal):

   SRI-ARC (2) and OFFICE-1 (53) have added logger sockets 27, but with
      Old-Protocol servers (are these forerunners of New-Protocol
      servers?);
   SDC-CC (110) has been removed from the list until it starts operating
      on the network
   LL-67 (12) now has a New-Protocol server on socket 1;
   CASE-10 (15) has departed from the network;
   BBN-TENEX is now host 361 (formerly 105);
   ANL (ARGONNE, 67) has come on the net with Old- and New-Protocol
      servers on sockets 1 and 27, respectively.

   The following is the latest version* of the summary and tabulation of
   server-host Telnet servers.
           total server hosts             36      100%
           no New-Prot server             17       47%
           unknown status (new host)       1        3%
           total New-Prot implem.         18       50%
               New-Prot on socket 27,
                   Old on socket 1 (2)    10       28%
               New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3)    6       16%
               New-Prot on 1 only (3)      2        6%
   Notes:

   * All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run
     at various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the data.
     What is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen
     by the new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 20 Feb. 1975.

   (2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to
       all protocols and conventions, as I understand them.

   (3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New-
       Protocol servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt
       to communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs
       according to what control sequences are received.




Dodds                                                        PAGE 1 top


RFC 679 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers January 1975 Tabulation of server status for all server sites: Host Host Socket Socket New-Prot. Options No. Name 1 27 Implemented (if any) 101 UCLA-CCN Old X 201 UCLA-CCBS Old X 2 SRI-ARC Old Old 102 SRI-AI Old New I1,3,6; O3 3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X 4 UTAH-10 Old X 305 BBN-TENEXA Old New I1,3,6; O3 106 MIT-DMS New New I1,3; O3 206 MIT-AI Old X 306 MIT-ML Old X 7 RAND-RCC Old X 10 SDC-LAB Old X 11 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3 12 LL-67 New X None 112 LL-TX-2 Old X 13 SU-AI New* New* I1,3 16 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3 116 CMU-10A New New I1,3; O3 17 I4-TENEX Old X 217 KI4B-TENEX Old X 20 AMES-67 New New None 126 USC-ISI Old New I1,3,6; O3 226 USC-ISIB Old New I1,3,6; O3 27 USC-44 Old X 327 USC-ECL Old X 37 CCA-TENEX Old X 40 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3 43 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3 344 HAWAII-500 ? ? 52 LONDON Old X 53 OFFICE-1 Old Old 54 MIT-MULTICS New New None 61 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3 361 BBN-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3 162 BBN-TENEXD Old New I1,3,6; O3 67 ANL Old New I1,3,6; O3 Dodds PAGE 2 top

RFC 679 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers January 1975 Key: X No server at this socket ? Status not ascertained -- unable to connect to host I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #") O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #") (# is option number in new Protocol. All options implemented by anyone are: 0 Transmit-Binary 1 Echo 3 Suppress-Go-Ahead 6 Timing-Mark ) Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option requests. [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ] [ support from BBN Corp. and its successors. 7/2000 ] Dodds PAGE 3 top

February, 1975, Survey of New-Protocol Telnet Servers RFC TOTAL SIZE: 5264 bytes PUBLICATION DATE: Thursday, January 7th, 2010 LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)


RFC-ARCHIVE.ORG

© RFC 679: The IETF Trust, Thursday, January 7th, 2010
© the RFC Archive, 2024, RFC-Archive.org
Maintainer: J. Tunnissen

Privacy Statement